Ayesha Howard Accuses Anthony Edwards of “Extrinsic Fraud” in Child Support Battle

Ayesha Howard’s legal team has filed to vacate a child support order against NBA star Anthony Edwards, alleging that the order was obtained through extrinsic fraud. The filing argues that Edwards deliberately manipulated the process in ways that deprived Howard of a fair chance to defend her rights, a move that could unravel one of the most high-profile custody battles surrounding a rising NBA star.

At the heart of Howard’s argument is the doctrine of extrinsic fraud—legal misconduct that occurs outside the actual trial but prevents someone from fully presenting their case. Unlike intrinsic fraud, which involves false testimony or documents within a proceeding, extrinsic fraud targets the fairness of the entire process, such as concealing vital facts or deceiving the court about jurisdiction. Courts often treat such claims with urgency, as they cut at the very principle of equal access to justice.

Howard previously filed her child support case in Los Angeles, which Edwards’ side suggested was an attempt to gain a higher award than she would receive in Georgia. But in a statement from Howard’s legal team, they claim Edwards’ actions “were deliberate, calculated, and intended to deceive the court on the threshold issue of personal jurisdiction.” The filing underscores their belief that the Minnesota Timberwolves star engaged in maneuvers specifically to mislead the court.

The legal team also points to Edwards’ business ties as evidence of jurisdictional misrepresentation. “Mr. Edwards holds multiple active business entities that are registered with the Secretary of State and trademarked with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, all of which list their principal business addresses in Beverly Hills, California. Additionally, he is exclusively represented by WME Sports, a Beverly Hills-based agency that manages his endorsements, business negotiations, and career affairs,” Howard’s team stated.

Howard gave birth to her daughter in October 2024 and has accused Edwards of withholding both emotional and financial support throughout her pregnancy. She has also denied viral rumors that Edwards prepaid millions in child support upfront. If her extrinsic fraud claim succeeds, the existing child support order could be vacated entirely, forcing both sides back into court to re-litigate custody, support, and jurisdiction from the ground up.

The stakes are high for both parties. For Howard, the motion is not just about money, but about fairness and recognition of her rights within the legal process. For Edwards, the battle comes amid the peak of his NBA career, with increased media attention and public scrutiny surrounding his off-court responsibilities. A court decision in Howard’s favor could reset the legal playing field and alter the trajectory of this contentious case.